$schema: https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema
title: Quality Annotation
description: "A single statement of uncertainty or confidence about a workflow's results
  \u2014 a separate axis from `maturityStatus` (see bblocks://ogc.focal.transferability.maturityStatus):
  FP-WF1 is `operational` *and* carries a caveat that its results are decision-support,
  not exact, and the two facts don't collapse into one. Repeatable at the workflow
  level, same discipline as `envelopeConstraint`.\nCurrently evidenced 1/8 (FP-WF1
  only) \u2014 thinner evidence than any other confirmed transferability gap; expect
  this to grow once other workflow owners are consulted.\n**Binds directly to the
  W3C Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV, `https://www.w3.org/ns/dqv#`)**, checked 2026-09-02
  against the published spec rather than assumed: `dimension` maps to `dqv:inDimension`,
  whose range `dqv:Dimension` is itself a `skos:Concept` \u2014 the open-SKOS-vocabulary
  pattern used everywhere else in this model turns out to already be DQV's own pattern,
  not just an analogy to it. No OGC Block wraps DQV (checked: no register or bblock
  defines it; the only other DQV usage anywhere in the bblocks ecosystem is a Tier-3
  sibling, `ogc.hosted.iliad.api.features.indicator-quality-requirement`, shaped for
  a different domain), so this binds straight to the published namespace rather than
  depending on anything. `note` has no exact DQV equivalent (DQV's annotation body
  normally comes via `oa:hasBody`, heavier machinery than needed here) and stays a
  plain FOCAL property.\nA numeric quality measurement (which would map to `dqv:QualityMeasurement`)
  has no evidenced case yet and no property here. An earlier draft reserved a `measurement`
  property with no type and no binding, which validated literally any value and invited
  reviewers to fill it with anything; the intent is better recorded in prose until
  a real measurement turns up to shape it.\n"
type: object
required:
- dimension
properties:
  dimension:
    type: string
    examples:
    - decision-support-only
    - validation-incomplete
    - spatial-support-mismatch
    description: 'What kind of uncertainty/confidence statement this is. Open vocabulary
      (SKOS), bound to `dqv:inDimension` -> `dqv:Dimension`.

      '
    x-jsonld-id: http://www.w3.org/ns/dqv#inDimension
    x-jsonld-type: '@id'
    x-jsonld-base: https://w3id.org/ogc/hosted/focal/transferability/quality-dimensions/
  note:
    type: string
    description: 'The statement itself, in free text (e.g. FP-WF1''s caveat verbatim:
      "AI model and validation are still being finalised, results are decision-support
      not exact"). No DQV binding.

      '
    x-jsonld-id: https://w3id.org/ogc/hosted/focal/transferability/properties/note
x-jsonld-prefixes:
  dqv: http://www.w3.org/ns/dqv#
  focal-transf-prop: https://w3id.org/ogc/hosted/focal/transferability/properties/